top of page
Search

Swing Voters or Low-Propensity Voters? How Campaigns Decide Where to Focus

  • Dante Vitagliano
  • May 18
  • 2 min read

Every campaign faces the same resource constraint: limited time, money, and staff. With those limits comes a critical strategic question—should you focus on persuading undecided voters or mobilizing supporters who may not show up on Election Day?

Understanding the difference—and the opportunity—between persuadable and low-propensity voters is essential to building a smart, data-informed campaign plan.



Defining the Two Audiences


Persuadable Voters

These voters tend to:

  • Sit in the ideological middle or exhibit ticket-splitting behavior

  • Vote regularly, but remain undecided or loosely affiliated

  • Require messaging that shifts attitudes, not just turnout


Low-Propensity Voters

These voters tend to:

  • Hold strong views or consistent partisan leanings

  • Appear infrequently on voter rolls in off-years or primaries

  • Need motivation, reminders, and emotional or identity-driven appeals


Both groups can be valuable. The challenge is knowing which is more valuable in your context.


How Campaigns Decide: Key Factors


1. District Dynamics

  • Is the electorate evenly split, or is it skewed?

  • In competitive districts, swaying a small number of voters can change the outcome.

  • In safe districts, boosting turnout can be more impactful than changing minds.

2. Cycle Type

  • Presidential elections usually have higher turnout—making persuasion more central.

  • In midterm or municipal races, turnout drops, and low-propensity voter mobilization can be decisive.

3. Resource Allocation

  • Persuasion campaigns often require heavier media, more nuanced messaging, and greater targeting precision.

  • Turnout campaigns may be more efficient through grassroots, peer-to-peer, and GOTV-focused efforts.


Modeling to Bridge the Gap


Modern analytics allow campaigns to stop treating these groups as mutually exclusive. Through layered modeling, you can:

  • Identify mid-frequency voters who are somewhat likely to vote and somewhat persuadable

  • Target voters with issue-based or behavioral predictors of activation

  • Combine support likelihood and vote likelihood to build ranked contact universes


This turns binary decisions into strategic prioritization.


Case-in-Point: The “Persuadable-But-Sporadic” Segment


Some of the highest ROI targeting comes from a segment that’s often overlooked:

  • Voters who don’t turn out regularly

  • But show signs of digital engagement or recent registration

  • And aren’t firmly aligned with any side


These voters can be swayed and mobilized—but only if campaigns find them early and message consistently.


Final Takeaway: Context Is King


No campaign wins by guessing. The choice between focusing on persuasion or turnout shouldn’t be ideological—it should be analytical.


With the right data, campaigns can:

  • Prioritize the highest-impact voter segments

  • Tailor their strategies to match cycle conditions

  • Maximize ROI on every dollar and door knock


The smartest campaigns aren’t choosing one group over another—they’re using turnout models and voter scoring to invest where it matters most.


Reach out today to learn how M3's data analytics and modeling capabilities help campaigns make better decisions.

 
 
bottom of page